A preparedness tool that reveals your evidence gaps at a glance — organised around the five key questions — so you walk into inspection knowing exactly where you stand.
You know your service delivers good care. But when an inspection lands, the scramble begins — proof scattered across folders, drives, and people's heads. The gap between what you do and what you can show is where good services get marked down.
Evidence pulled together in a panic the week before — never a calm, standing picture of where you actually are.
No single view of which key questions are well-evidenced and which are thin — until an inspector finds the hole for you.
Built for "any care setting," they miss the language and evidence that MH and LD services are actually judged on.
Three steps to a live view of your inspection readiness — kept current as you go, not rebuilt each time.
Record documents and activities against your setting and discipline. The right evidence types are already built in — you're not starting from a blank page.
Each item is placed under the CQC domain it supports — automatically suggested — so your evidence organises itself around Safe, Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led.
The gap analysis shows coverage per domain and lists exactly what's missing — with a one-click route to close each gap.
One screen that answers the question you actually lose sleep over: what are we missing?
See at a glance which of the five domains are well-evidenced and which are thin.
Not a vague score — the actual evidence types you haven't logged yet, named plainly.
Every missing item links straight to logging it — so the list gets shorter as you work.
"I built the tool I wished I'd had — one that speaks the language of the services it's actually for."
Most compliance tools are built by software teams who've never held a caseload or sat through an inspection. This one is different: it's built by a registered mental health nurse who has.
That's why the evidence libraries use the language your services are genuinely judged on — PBS plans, restrictive-practice records, Mental Capacity assessments, Right Support / Right Care / Right Culture — instead of generic care-home boilerplate.
Credibility you can feel in the detail, not a badge on a landing page.
Book a 20-minute demo and I'll show you your evidence gaps mapped to the five key questions — using your setting, not a generic template.